Skip to main content

Taking care with HSE metrics


Corporate dashboards will often bring together a series of metrics that are intended to give a balanced view of how the whole organisation or a division, directorate or department is performing.  It is often the case that health and safety performance indicators will appear alongside those traditionally used to drive financial performance of the business such as sales, production, utilisation, costs and head count.  The increasing importance of Health and Safety, and hence the desire to improve performance, has been driven in part by the clearly growing negative consequences of failure to protect employees and the public, but also the increasing desire for organisations to be seen as agents of good in the community.

There is, however, a danger that an executive viewing an improving trend on his Health and Safety metrics may be misled into thinking that this improving trend will continue.  With other measures, like improving sales or improving efficiency, it will often be the case that the reasons for improvement can be expected to be maintained at least in the short to medium term.  Opening new markets, launching new products or improving sales capability are positive factors that drive improved sales and profit that once earned generally do not disappear overnight.  Similarly, performance improvements implemented to drive efficiency are likely to endure over the medium term at least.  With improving Health and Safety metrics cannot be a point at which back are patted because the next workplace injury, the next fatality or the next catastrophic disaster can come out of the blue.  Health and safety professionals have long understood that there is a safety incident Pyramid.  One study carried out by Conoco Philips Marine in 2003 identified that for every fatal incident you would expect to see 30 lost time incidents and 300 near misses.  What the Pyramid cannot help with is determining when in 331 incidents the fatality will occur.  It could be the first or the 331st.  Constant vigilance is required for sustained improvement in Health and Safety.

It is also the case that many organisations do not have a firm grasp of the Health and Safety risks they are taking.  Even companies with seemingly mature risk assessment and safety management procedures can fall foul of risk taken for operational expediency at a relatively low level in the organisation.  For example, when a production plant’s fire protection systems have a reported fault it is very easy for plant managers to take the risk, continue production and just make sure someone gets out to fix the fault as soon as possible.  Or the shut-off valve that is jammed open. As long as the plant keeps producing it’s not a problem. Both these scenarios expose the organisation to significant risk, the kind of risk that could lead to catastrophe. However, neither would show up in LTI or a Loss of Containment reports.  They may not even show up on planned maintenance metrics: the fire control system was fixed in two days and the valve isn’t meant to be looked at for another 18 months “lets just sweep those under the carpet”.  Which leads us to consider the completeness and accuracy (to borrow the accounting phrase) of Health and Safety metrics.

Measurement of metrics in Health and Safety do not typically have the same rigour that financial measures have associated with them.  There is unlikely to be the level of external scrutiny that financial statements have applied to them.  The auditing profession has well over a century of collective experience in being able to assess financial statements.  In comparison, the effort expended in verifying Health and Safety performance measures could be described as cursory.  Whether incidents or near misses are reported will remain a function of how much importance each organisation, from the top to the bottom, places on improving its health and safety.  At the end of the day, it will come down to the organisation’s culture. Does the foreman view an injury to one of his team as an opportunity to learn, for him and the whole organisation, or something negative to try and avoid reporting if possible?  “You can still drive the truck with your arm bandaged, John” and “Sally twisted ankle won’t stop her coming in to answer the phones”.

Cold health and safety metrics do not tell the same story that a day, a week, a month visit by an experienced external health and safety manager or process safety engineer would quickly provide.  This is why the follow up and closure of external audit and assessment actions is one of the better ways of measuring the cultural risk an organisation faces. 

However, changing culture is not a simple task.  It has to start with leadership commitment and then engage the whole workforce in:

·         Understanding what the organisation is trying to achieve

·         Explaining the behaviours that are required and encouraged
Building capability to deliver safety performance improvement.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brown paper bag accounting

I recently had cause to recall a type of work I did whilst studying to become a chartered accountant and in the period just after I qualified - brown paper bag accounts .  This is not some kind of under the table tax evasion scheme but a phrase used to describe the accounts preparation work for the smallest of small businesses. It describes what the client would provide in terms of records from which to draw-up accounts, submit their VAT returns and produce their tax returns.  It would be a bag (ok, sometimes and folder or a box) of expense receipts of various types, from shop tills and handwritten chits to vellum fee notes from solicitors.  There would also be a bunch of bank statements and credit card bills.  If you were lucky there would be a cash book which may record the client's drawings (money taken from the business for personal use) but often not. This was at first a huge struggle for a new trainee, but with guidance from senior colleagues a...

What I learnt...managing a high pressure technology project

Our team were engaged to take over the management of a core system development project for a telecoms operator.  The project had been started with the intention of replacing core customer management, billing, fault management and service provisioning systems for the B2B division in time to launch a new product that would be supported by the new systems. The CEO was concerned that the project was drifting.  A sizeable team (40+) of independent contractors had been brought on board but as the CEO said "contractors were hiring contractors" and there seemed to be a lack of accountability.  Our role was to provide that accountability and manage the project to meet the deadline, a mere five months away. There were some specific challenges that increased the pressure on the programme manager (me): a sizeable portion of our fees were contingent on the product being able to be launched as planned in five months the new B2B product was not fully confirmed so system and produ...

What I learnt...as Finance Director of a small UK motor car manufacturer

I was reminded recently of one of the more interesting episodes in my career when, for about twelve months, I was fortunate to be seconded to a small car manufacturer as Finance Director (both the cars and the company were small!).  It presented an exciting departure from my normal way of working but was also an opportunity to learn.  Here are the major takeaways for me from this experience: Collective executive responsibility Being part of the executive team meant that we plotted the course for the company and that we all bought into the strategy and the plan to deliver it.  We were making significant changes to the products, to the manufacturing process and to the supply chain and we all had to be clear about what we were doing, why we were doing it and how we were going about it.  Employees, shareholders, bankers, auditors and the press would be asking questions and we had to be consistent and clear in answering those questions but then in the actions and decis...