Skip to main content

Making Process Safety personal

I have been fortunate enough to have facilitated a series of process safety workshops for managers and supervisors of oil and gas facilities around the world.  In these sessions we usually get a senior leader to kick-off the session by sharing with the group why they think process safety is important.  We try to coach the leader to not just repeat the corporate party line but to share an incident from their past career that brought home to them why process safety is personally top of their agenda.  Unfortunately, for senior leaders with 20+ years in the industry few do not have incidents they can recount where death or injury of colleagues has personally affected them. Many of these stories leave the room in hushed silence, its like a room of 40 people taking a collective gulp. 

From a workshop perspective, this sets up the event perfectly and focusses the group on the importance and impact of the subject. But I often wonder what my personal story is.  As a consultant I have visited many facilities.  Often I will get a tour of the site (I enjoy donning my borrowed flame retardant overalls, hard hat, steel-toed boots and safety goggles) but I have never worked on a facility or been responsible for a team working on one. So I cannot do a really authentic personal story apart from the one below.

AZF chemical facility, Toulouse:  I was working in the French city of Toulouse for an aerospace client based close to the airport.  It was a mere 10 days after  September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks against the USA.   There was a pervading sense of unease as those attacks involved civil aircraft and a severe impact on air travel and thereby my client's business was feared.  I was in meeting when suddenly the windows blew inwards and we heard a load bang.  Everyone rushed outside (in hindsight that could have been unwise) and like all Toulousain we feared we were under attack.  In fact it was an explosion in the fertilizer plant in the southern part of the city (so 4 or 5 miles away) that killed 29 people and wounded 2,500.  Naturally, terrorism was suspected but it turned out to be a process safety incident.  The explosion affected he whole city.  I think few people in La Ville Rose did not have friends or family who were casualties.  The wife of one of my client team was injured and that impacted us. Along with the deaths and injuries this explosion caused circa  1.5 billion euros of damage, a result of the plant's proximity to the city centre.

Some who have been at these workshops I facilitate may remember my "harbinger of doom" story.  I won't share it here as I would have to reveal client names and also it can be taken as a bit flippant, which it isn't, as it about seeing the internal impact on an organisation of major incidents.

Having stories to tell about process safety incidents is important for leaders in the industry as they are one tool to help tackle the natural slide into complacency and "risk normalization" that can happen with staff that live and/or work every day on oil and gas facilities.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Making operational risk personal

Having worked in in the risk and safety management area of the oil and gas industry I have seen, and in small part helped, some of the leading operators work hard on improving their safety culture.  The realisation in the industry has been that layers of processes and controls can only go so far. Front line staff need to remain aware of the risks they face and not become complacent such that they do not spot those small indicators that something is out of place.   So creating a culture that counters this tendency toward complacency, or risk normalisation, has been a focus for oil and gas operators. The oil and gas industry is not the only one that faces risks that could lead to catastrophic losses and the removal of the licence to operate. Financial institutions have faced such losses through failures in processes and controls around rogue trading, mis-selling of products and failures in anti-money laundering controls.  The Basel Committee on Banking Stability (BCBS) as well as re

Are safety KPIs counter-productive?

A colleague who works with a major international oil and gas company said “Safety KPIs achieve the exact opposite of their original intent”. Whilst he was undoubtedly being provocative to stimulate internal debate, the basis for such a bold statement can be seen in organisations that have comprehensive reporting mechanisms but still suffer from major safety incidents. Safety performance metrics face an inherent difficulty in that managers have a strong temptation to make their numbers as good as possible when they report their performance.   This will be true for safety just as it is for production, sales, financials and any other business performance metric.   Unfortunately, this tendency is the exact opposite of what is required for good safety performance.   A common theme in many of the major catastrophic industrial incidents is the fact that warning signs were there but were not reported.     If there is a bias that emphasises the good and glosses over the bad, there is li

What I learnt...as Finance Director of a small UK motor car manufacturer

I was reminded recently of one of the more interesting episodes in my career when, for about twelve months, I was fortunate to be seconded to a small car manufacturer as Finance Director (both the cars and the company were small!).  It presented an exciting departure from my normal way of working but was also an opportunity to learn.  Here are the major takeaways for me from this experience: Collective executive responsibility Being part of the executive team meant that we plotted the course for the company and that we all bought into the strategy and the plan to deliver it.  We were making significant changes to the products, to the manufacturing process and to the supply chain and we all had to be clear about what we were doing, why we were doing it and how we were going about it.  Employees, shareholders, bankers, auditors and the press would be asking questions and we had to be consistent and clear in answering those questions but then in the actions and decisions we took. Vis